翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R v Andrews ・ R v Asante-Mensah ・ R v Askov ・ R v Attorney General for England and Wales ・ R v B ・ R v B (KG) ・ R v Badger ・ R v Bailey ・ R v Baillie ・ R v Barger ・ R v Bartle ・ R v Basi ・ R v Beaulac ・ R v Belnavis ・ R v Betts and Ridley ・ R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ・ R v Birmingham City Council, ex p Equal Opportunities Commission ・ R v Blaue ・ R v Bonjon ・ R v Boucher ・ R v Bourke ・ R v Bournewood Community and Mental Health NHS Trust ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2) ・ R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 3) ・ R v Bowden ・ R v Brown ・ R v Bryan ・ R v Brydges ・ R v Buhay Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd ''R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd'' is a landmark decision by Supreme Court of Canada where the Court struck down the ''Lord's Day Act'' for violating section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This case had many firsts in constitutional law including being the first to interpret section 2. == Background == On Sunday, May 30, 1982 the Calgary store Big M Drug Mart was charged with unlawfully carrying on the sale of goods on a Sunday contrary to the ''Lord's Day Act'' of 1906. At trial the store was acquitted and an appeal was dismissed by the Alberta Court of Appeal. The constitutional question put before the Court was whether the Act infringed the right to freedom of conscience and religion, if so, whether it is justified under section 1 of the Charter, and whether the Act was intra vires (within) Parliament's criminal power under section 91(27) of the Constitution Act, 1867. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.